That is a big reason why large businesses like Carbon Black. Whitelisting should work 100% of the time, if you can get around the issue of all the false positives. The real question is how well do they work against malware release, 4, 8, 12 hours ago? Malwarebytes may have already added and removed their signature for many of these attacks, (as they do not keep signature for old malware) before this test was run. The issue is that the majority of these samples have likely been around for a long time thus the major vendors should all have signatures for them. What do SpiceHeads think?I do not doubt the test results for a second. I find this situation troubling and confusing. Usually, this type of partnership has a "pay to play" relationship. The ONLY action left for A/V is Behavioral Heuristics! %u2003HOW CAN YOU TEST WHAT YOU CAN'T SEE? A delay in execution evades all sandbox technology. It is tested against every A/V to guarantee it! Every sample is unique and polymorphic, so signature detection is completely useless. What do SpiceHeads think?Ĭrypto / Ransomware is designed to bypass detection of ALL stages of Anti-Virus. "PC Pitstop partnered with AV Comparatives to create a comprehensive and superior detection rate test" We have seen the lackluster results (poor detection) of Webroot due to definition-less detections, and that is shown! And how can you test what you can't see? And how can you test what you can't see?
However, it is about time that somebody tested Malwarebytes and Webroot (and they said it couldn't be done!). The ONLY action left for A/V is Behavioral Heuristics! HOW CAN YOU TEST WHAT YOU CAN'T SEE? They just don't match what we are seeing in the real word.Ĭrypto / Ransomware is designed to bypass detection of ALL stages of Anti-Virus. I can tell you for SURE, that I do NOT believe those AV-Comparative results on Ransomware detection.
0 kommentar(er)
